The Patriot Caucus

Posted by Joyce Rosenwald on January 29, 2010 at 5:33am in CITIZENS OF THE REPUBLIC

FEDERAL REGIONALISM
The Abolishment of Local Government
Below is the blueprint for the abolishment of state and county government by the institution of "Regionalism."
Centralization of power must be stopped because centralized power in the federal government, and the resulting loss of States' rights, is the one thing necessary for the success of a ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT.
REGIONAL GOVERNMENT
UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION ARTICLE IV, SECTION 3, PARAGRAPH 1:
"New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new State shall be formed or erected within the jurisdiction of two or more States.; or parts of States without the consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as the Congress."
President Nixon, on March 27, 1969, through the Government Reorganization Act divided the United States into 10 Regions. To further implement this Regional Governance over the U.S.A., President Nixon signed Executive Order 11647 and entered it in the Federal Register February 12, 1972. (Vol .37, No.30) Through the authority vested in him as President of the United States, President Nixon established a Federal Regional Council for each of the 10 standard regions. It stated that, the President shall designate one member of each Council as Chairman of the Council and such Chairman shall serve at the pleasure of the President. The fact that State borders have been destroyed to create 10 REGIONS instead of 50 Union States is something your government doesn't want you to know.

There is no constitutional jurisdiction for the federal government to legislate for a municipal government in a Union State. The usurpation of state jurisdiction can only be achieved by conspiracy and fraud on the part of our duly elected public servants. It stands to reason that if there is no constitutional jurisdiction for the federal government to legislate for a municipal government in a Union state, there is also no jurisdiction for a federal bureaucracy to legislate for a municipal government in a Union state. As example: the EPA, the DEA, the IRS and the FBI, etc., have no Constitutional authority to legislate in a Union State. These are agencies of the Federal government, having jurisdiction only on federal territory. This is something your government doesn't want you to know.
Demeaning the authority of elected officials and replacement of these officials by appointed Federal "administrators" is a CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER to representative government posed by Federal Regional Government. Outlawed by the Supreme Court decision of January 13, 1982 (Case #80-1350, "Community Communications Co, Inc v City of Boulder, CO) the ten regional capitols were dismantled by President Reagan's Executive Order #12407 on February 22, 1983.
However, grant making agencies of the ten Federal Regions remain in place assuring continuity of control over all Americans and their elected representatives by the central government.

Federal grants to state government are the fuel which make the Regional engines "go." The individual Union States are blackmailed, through the withholding of federal funds, if federal legislation is not enacted into State law, thereby opening the door to a power base for the silent revolution of Federal Regionalism.

There is a clear pattern of uniformity in all laws passed. On the state level, all fifty legislatures appear to become simultaneously concerned about solving a particular problem in an identical fashion. On the local level, the same thing happens in thousands of City Halls and County Seats. This strange coincidence is never publicized by the press, thereby it is rarely questioned by the public. Unknown to most of the public, all our laws are written by the Uniform Commission on State Law, also known as the Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations. (ACIR)
FATAL STEPS
PRESIDENTIAL PROCLAMATIONS 2039 and 2040 March 6, 1933, March 9, 1933
Declaration of National Emergency and Declaration of War against the American People by the Government of the United States.
WAR POWERS ACT . . . March 9, 1933
TITLE 12 USC. Section 95(a) and 95(b)
This Act states that "During time of war or during any period of national emergency declared by the President, the President may, through any agency that he may designate, or otherwise investigate, regulate, prohibit, under such rules and regulationas as he may prescribe, by means of licenses or otherwise, any transactions in foreign exchange, transfers of credit between or payments by banking institutions as drfined by the President and export, hoarding, melting, or earmarkings of gold or silver coin or bullion or currancy, by any person within the United States or anyplace subject to the jurisdiction thereof.
FEDERAL REGISTER ACT . . . July 26, 1935
The Federal Register Act enabled the president to create unlimited bureaucracies and empower them with the force of law. All that was needed to implement bureaucratic regulations into law was to enter or publish those regulations in the Federal Register, by-passing all constitutional oversight.
THE BUCK ACT . . . October 9, 1940
Congress in 1940 passed the "Buck Act" 4 U.S.C.S. 104-113. By clever legal maneuvers from 1935 to 1940, the feds entirely circumvented the U.S. Constitution. In Section 110(e), this Act allowed any department of the federal government to create a "Federal Area" for imposition of the Public Salary Tax Act of 1939, the imposition of this tax is at 4 U.S.C.S. section 111, and the rest of the taxing law is in Title 26, The Internal Revenue Code. The Social Security Board had already created an overlay of a "Federal Area."
As a result, the Federal Government created Federal "States" which are exactly like the Sovereign States, occupy the same territory and boundaries, but whose names are capitalized versions of the Sovereign States. (Remember that Proper Names and Proper Nouns in the English language have only the first letter Capitalized.) For example, the Federal "State" of ILLINOIS is overlaid upon the Sovereign State of Illinois. Further, it is designated by the Federal abbreviation of "IL", instead of the Sovereign State abbreviation of "Ill." So too is Arizona designated "AZ" instead of the lawful abbreviation of "Ariz.", "CA" instead of "Calif.", etc. If you use a two-letter CAPITALIZED abbreviation, you are declaring that the location is under the jurisdiction of the "federal" government instead of the powers of the "Sovereign" state.
As a result of creating these "shadow" States, the Federal government assumes that every area is a "Federal Area," and that the Citizens therein are "Federal" citizens.
PUBLIC LAW 79-404 entitled "Administrative Procedures Act of 1946."
This act set up the procedure yielding lawmaking authority to agencies in the executive sector of government (federal bureaucracies), and provided that administrative rules and regulations be printed in the Federal Register giving these regulations the force of law.
TITLE 3 USC Section 301, October 31, 1951: General authorization to delegate functions; publication of delegations.
This law authorized the President of the United States to designate and empower the head of any department or agency in the executive branch, or any official thereof who is required to be appointed by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to perform without approval, ratification, or other action by the President (1) any function which is vested in the President by law, or (2) any function which such officer is required or authorized by law to perform only with or subject to the approval, ratification, or other action of the President:
Provided, That nothing contained in the act relieved the President of his responsibility in office for the acts of any such head or other official designated by him to perform such functions. Such designation and authorization would be in writing, and published in the Federal Register.
PUBLIC LAW 86-380 and its amendment 89-733, 1959 under the Eisenhower Administration, created the Advisory Council On Intergovernmental Relations. (ACIR) This commission consists of 26 individuals, of which 14 are appointees representing groups such as the Council of State Governments, The League of Cities, the National Association of Counties, and the Governors Conference . . . all proponents and strong lobbyists for Federal grant programs that are subordinating local governments to Regional governing bodies.
PUBLIC LAW 89-136 entitled "Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965".
This act is the basis for the manner in which the 10 Federal regions are to be governed by a "Multi-State Regional Commission". It also states that the Secretary of Commerce has the power to "acquire in any lawful manner, any property (real or personal) whenever deemed necessary."
PUBLIC LAW 89-754. The Model Cities Act of 1966.
Section 204 of this act requires that a broad spectra of public facilities type projects which seek federal assistance must be brought under the aegis of area wide Regional comprehensive planning agencies, the clearing house system.
PUBLIC LAW 90-577 1968, 90th Congress, INTERGOVERNMENTAL COOPERATION ACT
"To achieve the fullest cooperation and coordination of activities among the levels of government . . . to establish coordinated intergovernmental policy and administration . . . to provide for the acquisition, use, and disposition of land within urban areas by Federal agencies."
PUBLIC LAW 90-577 destroyed the separation of powers which is the principle of the U.S. Constitution. By its Title IV the U.S. Congress purported to yield legislative power to the president. He, in turn, allegedly transferred that law making power to his appointed directors in the grant making agencies of the Federal Regions per section 403 of the Bill. Out of that arrangement has grown the A-95 regional clearing house review system, designed by the Office of Management and Budget. The resulting Federal Region-Sub State control system straps regional governance (control by regulation) as a way of life over all America.
The separation of powers principle of the U.S. Constitution is destroyed by Title IV of this Regional Law in which Congress yields Legislative Power to the U.S. President. Through this act, the President was empowered to yield that lawmaking power to his appointees. (Section 403) From that arrangement has grown the controversial A-95 REGIONAL CLEARING HOUSE review system designed by the executive OMB (Office of Budget and Management). This system binds Regionalism over all of America by non-laws (administrative rules and regulations) which are not backed by LAW.
Congress thus legislated a system of government that is not permitted by our U.S. Constitution.
March 27, 1969, President Richard M. Nixon announced that he had divided the United States into eight (subsequently ten) Federal Regions. The President, by his act, set in motion a series of events which, unless reversed will dissolve sovereign state governments, disenfranchise the electorate, and merge the American pioneer spirit in an amorphous "world citizenship". The American people have been moved into the orbit of a financial/industrial cabal who control their corporate world state through the United Nations, the U.S. Congress, and other front organizations.
The fatal steps which transformed the Republic into a dictatorship of the financial elite are set out in the following Congressional statutes, executive orders, and proclamations which trace a seditious conspiracy of interlocking subversion in government departments during the period October 16, 1968 to 20 October, 1972.

27 March, 1969
STATEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT ON RESTRUCTURING OF GOVERNMENT SERVICE SYSTEMS, The White House
Quoting the Reorganization Act, signed the same day, as his authority, President Nixon divided the United States into eight (later ten) Federal Regions or provinces, each with a new provincial capitol. Coordination and control of the ten Federal Regions would be administered from Washington. Formation of such "super states" is, of course, a violation of paragraph 1, section 3, Article IV, United States Constitution.
Objective: To transfer political power from the respective sovereign State government to appointed Federal agencies, whose controllers are the directors of the corporate world state.
30 October, 1969
EXECUTIVE ORDER #11490, "Assigning Emergency Preparedness Functions to Federal Departments and Agencies,". . . The Federal Register
E.O. 11490 consolidated executive orders of previous administrations into one omnibus directive, and provided for implementation of its powers "by an order or directive issued by the President in any national emergency type of situation."
E.O. 11490 authorizes the Office of Emergency Planning to put all controls into effect "in times of economic or financial crisis."
Takeover by government agencies includes: communications media; all electrical power, gas, petroleum fuels, and minerals; food resources and farms; all modes of transportation and control of highways, seaports, etc.; health, education, and welfare functions; airports and aircraft.
Provision is also made for the mobilization of civilians into work brigades under government supervision. The order directs the Postmaster General to operate a national registration of all persons; permits the Housing and Finance Authority to relocate communities, and grants authority to the Department of Justice to enforce the plans set out in E.O. 11490, and to operate penal and correctional institutions.
29 December, 1970
PUBLIC LAW 91-596 -- OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT OF 1970
PUBLIC LAW 91-596 known as the "Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970" was passed. This Act was necessary in order to gain control of private property "usage". The Act specifically limited itself to private businesses and excluded State, County, Municipal, School District, and Conservation District governing bodies.
It set forth that its enabling legislation must provide that the above State government and its political subdivisions must also abide by the standards set forth in the Federal Act.
15 August, 1971 EXECUTIVE ORDER 311615, "Providing for Stabilization of Prices, Rents, Wages, and Salaries," The Federal Register
E.O. 11615 designated the Chairman, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System as the director of a Cost of Living Council, with authority to request the Department of Justice to bring actions for injunctions "whenever it appears to the Council that any person has engaged, is engaged, or is about to engage in any acts or practices constituting a violation of any regulation or order issued pursuant to this Order." (See EO 11490).
The Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board thus became czar over prices, rents, wages, and salaries, in addition to his control over money, interest rates, and the stock market, granted under the provisions of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913.
15 August, 1971
PROCLAMATION #4074, "Imposition of Supplemental Duty for Balance of Payments Purposes," The President.
The principal objective of Proclamation 4074 was to "declare a national emergency" and so establish stand-by authority to implement any or all of the of the provisions of Executive Order #11490 at such time as the American people had been conditioned to accept dictatorship. The people are now being brainwashed to accept, in fact demand, full government control over their lives and property.
12 February, 1972
EXECUTIVE ORDER #11647, "Federal Regional Councils", The Federal Register
E.O.#11647 established a Federal Regional Council for each of the ten standard Federal Regions" which Nixon effected by proclamation on March 27, 1969. The Office of Management and Budget was designed to be the control agency.
By this order the ten provincial capitols were staffed by the directors of grant-making agencies: Department of Labor, Health, Education and Welfare, and Housing and Urban Development, the Secretarial Representatives of the Department of Transportation, and the directors of the regional offices of the Office of Economic Opportunity, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration.
The President of the United States subsequently appointed a commissar for each Federal Region.
18 October, 1972
PUBLIC LAW 92-500 -- FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ACT AMENDMENTS OF 1972
PUBLIC LAW 92-500, which is known as the "Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972" was passed which set forth that States may assume pollution control enforcement on all businesses, land owners, and their equipment and land. This Act provides an effective "informer system" for citizens to squeal on their neighbors and/or employers. It also creates a body corporate to be known as the Environmental Financing Authority to have the power to acquire private property (real or personal) by whatever means and to also sell or lease said property. It also set forth that if the States desired to assume the enforcement duties of the federal government that it--the State--must enact enabling legislation which must be approved by the federal government.
20 October, 1972
PUBLIC LAW 95-512, 92nd Congress, H.R. 14370 -- FEDERAL---STATE REVENUE SHARING
"To . . . authorize Federal collection of State individual income taxes, and for other purposes." The primary function of P.L. 92-512 is to provide that, "after January 1, 1974, if two or more States request it of the U.S. government, and at the option of the individual States, all State taxes may be collected and administered by the federal government." (The decision is irreversible.) It further provides a "ceiling and floor" for State Income Taxes, and states that no State may thereafter alter its tax structure without first obtaining permission of the federal government. It further provides for the manner in which State and local "boundary changes, and government reorganization" could be handled.
Under this Act, state and county governments will, in time, wither for lack of tax funds, representative government will die (although the trappings of a republican form of government may be retained to fool the people), and dictatorial control over people and property will be imposed upon once free Americans.

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Simon, that was a head spinner. There certainly are no arguements to be made here from this reader as to the overall tenants of your presentation. You use Article IV, section 3, of the Constitution. I'm sitting here trying to understand how this provision would prevent Nixon from intitiating Executive Policy for administrative control.

I would say a better definition of this section would be helpfull.

Resectfully Smitty

Reply to This

Please provide the names of the 10 regions and their capitals that the country had been divided into by Nixon. Also, were not the names of the states put into two letter abbreviations in order for the mail to be sorted easier?

Why would any nation want to give up its sovereignty in order to create one world government? Nations do agree through treaties and agreements to cooperate and coordinate with each other (otherwise, we would have lots of plane crashes, for example) but that is not the same as one world government.

Also, should local governments reject federal funding when offered? Should members of Congress, in order to serve the needs of their district/state, not try to obtain federal funds that might meet local needs (lets say for a bridge or dam)?

Reply to This

Here is the map of the ten regions click on the link and take a look. click Here

It is interesting

Reply to This

Simon, this is Smitty

I would appreciate a response to my question as to how Article IV, section 3 was abated to construct the Unconstitutional structure you have put forward.

The valitity of Executive Orders or those Public Laws are not in question. My quiry is to the relevance of the Article to their action.

I'm a little confused, because I read the Article like this: that no State can partition itself to make two States, and no 2 states can make three and so on. The wording expressed is WITHIN.

What you point to is dividing the Union into 10 regions not 10 idividual States.

I am not posing this question as a rebuttal, but merely a question to understand the relevance.

Respectfully Smitty

Reply to This

http://lisat2.multiply.com/journal/item/430/Obama_Establishes_COUNC...


IT'S NOT ABOUT DIVIDING STATES, sorry caps. I t is 10 Federal regions. Obama is doing ti now. 1o fema zones. Go to the link above and there are about 6 links with all the information.

Read up and see what you think.. 10 Govenors looking over the 10 FEMA zones. The states will be there - But national emergency The 10 gov and the 10 FEMA zones do what ?

You must make up your own mind.

Reply to This

Mr. Simon, I stand corrected. However, in the future, please included all the language in the Article's you choose to use. You left out this section of the language: or the Junction of two or more States.

That language gives your arguement standing for your position in this matter.

Although your conversation in this matter doesn't rely on the division of the States, it is inclusive in the Article.

Reply to This

Hurricanes and earthquakes dont care about state borders. Katrina not only hit Louisiana but did major damage all the way from Texas to Florida and beyond. Does it make sense for the federal government to place individual resources in each state separate from each other state, or is it more efficient to do it more regionally?

Also, during Katrina, did the states give up their sovereign rights to the Federal government or did they use the Federal government to provide supplemental assistance?

Note also that states do make agreements amongst themselves across state borders, for example the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (DC, MD, VA)

Lisa's web post also mentions 10 Social Security and 10 IRS divisions (this is not new at all). Would it be more efficient to run each of these agencies in each of the states? How does this prove. especially since this has been around for a long while, prove that the Federal government is interested in taking away all local powers? I dont have a USA license plate on my car....

Reply to This

Mr. Katz, I believe Simon makes a legitimate observation, whether it is an intentional act on the part of the Government or not.

The examples you use for your position are correct, however these are agreements that the individual States contracted with each other as you stated in the third paragraph. They are not Federal mandates.

In the case of Katrina, both would be correct. After the State and Local Governments screwed-up, they both gave up their control to the Federal Government for assistance.

Your last paragraph demonstrates a positive contribution, that in some cases, the FED has on society. Fire and Electical Codes that are mandated, provide uniform policies for all States as a safety mechanism.

Just a thought, Respectfully Smitty

Reply to This

Do not over kook the fact that I did not write this

Posted by Joyce Rosenwald on January 29, 2010 at 5:33am in CITIZENS OF THE REPUBLIC

The very first sentence in the post. I placed it here for discussion and it is being discussed.

That is a good thing

I thank you both

Reply to This

Simon,

I thought that this was your infomation that you posted. Also, with the word JUNCTION there is relevance.

I would say that your concerns are understood in this matter, however this is a Catch 22. I certainly agree that we want limited Government. Mr. Katz states and appropriately, that there are times that assistance is needed in cases of emergencies or as I stated in reference to saftey.

It is a shame that Congress has usurped the Commerce Clause. This is a great example of the warning Hamilton spoke too in the Federlist Papers about unlimited Power.

Then there are those people that believe that there are unlimited Inherent Rights (ie. Entitlement Programs) So how do you get those people to Vote against the very Politician that re-enforces that notion?

Unfortunately it will take at least a generation or two to re-educate our children, so they might be able to bring to the population and the Country a semblance of what the Constitution's real intent is.

respectfully, Smitty

Reply to This

Sorry about the spelling-----Reinforce

Reply to This

RSS

March on DC 9/9-9/11


Patriot Caucus is a proud supporter and sponsor of the 2010 March on DC.
Tweet This
Facebook
Dump Reid

© 2010   Created by Eric Odom.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service